Anyone should be able to see this clearly. All you have to do is search for "rug" sort by price ( low to high ) and you should be able to easily distinguish the same rug being offered dozens of times. No matter who says what, there is no doubt in my mind that it is actually the same person doing this under different logins. If you note they all have sold plenty since their inception. Its something that has gone unnoticed even by people that are sitting in front of their computers looking for rugs on eBAy for years. I off hand am not sure how many sellers are included in this batch but here are some : Rugsource
Takrugs
Stylemarket
Gracious Homes
Zazadesign
2bfashion
fantasyrugs
Nomadrug
Chateaurugs
masterpiecerugs
and probably twenty to thirty more IDs
The image of the rug used, is exactly the same image which signifies that this is a scam and what you can refer to as certain type of Monopoly. The idea behind it is , not everyone is looking for a specific rug and most rug buyers on eBAy just want a rug; most buyers spend an hour or two sifting and picking and then they eventually get tired and bid on something they have picked. Now I am pretty sure 70 to 80 percent of the rugs ( by count ) or even more, are rugs posted by this person / group. So in effect they are destroying the rug market for other unsuspecting rug sellers and dealers with this practice. Most of their rugs are inferior HSN Crap anyways. Now I have not really took time to read all the postings here and so if I am reiterating something that someone else has mentioned already , I apologize.
eBAy is aware of this ( and they either are on it or don't give a damn because they make their stinking commission anyway). If you bother asking them if doing so is illegal, they say yes but if you show them , they will just say ( oh what a beautiful blue sky ) and ignore it right out of your head...
I discussed this with a very well known Economist asking him if this falls within the boundaries of what could be considered monopolizing the rug market on eBAy and whether or not this is a suitable for an anti-trust action . He suggested that it depends on several factors. First of all, if this is being practiced internationally, i.e., this is occurring primarily in nations outside of the U.S., then American anti trust jurisdiction is not applicable. Secondly, if it is 60-70% of the market, then it may be a stretch to say this is true an anti-trust action. It may possibly fall under the Sherman Anti-trust's "conspiracy to monopolize" clause, but only if it could be proved eBay was essentially duped as well and is thus a victim of any possible conspiracy to form a monopoly as specified in the Sherman. Again , I know for a fact that eBay has been notified of such fact and has danced around it , so I guess one could take eBay to court ( which I think would be a good thing to do for all the other rug sellers on eBAy or I don't know maybe just sue the hell out of the group of sellers which are doing this.
Bottom line I guess I have to praise whoever who is doing this as it seems that he/she/they figured a way to dominate the rug market on eBAy!
Ah the hell with it, while we are at it, if anyone uses my thoughts, and pursue some kind of class action / anti-trust case against these people, they owe me royalties, so think twice before you start up one and negotiate my commission. Well another thing while we are at it , I do hope no one will come after me and they better not because I have a laser gun...
Ha ha ha....