Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

Short question,  KPSI as an indicator of wool or silk?
btuma6 Offline
#1 Posted : Saturday, April 11, 2009 4:53:18 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/12/2008(UTC)
Posts: 439
Points: 481
If a rug has at least 400KPSI is the logical suggestion, not conclusion, that the rug is silk or cotton, but probably not wool? If I have learned anything on this site it is that no are not absolutes. Therefore, I am only asking if this is an indicator.
In other words is wool to thick to have 400kpsi?

Thanks,
Sponsor  
 

Love the Rug Rag Forums?

Register above, then purchase a monthly Forum Pass for Full Access

RugPro Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:09:54 PM(UTC)
Rank: Administration

Groups: Administration, Dealers, Member

Joined: 2/9/2008(UTC)
Posts: 2,285
Points: 6,103
Location: New York
I think the above may have been derived from a comment I made but needs slight modification.

In the majority of instances, a rug with over 400 KPSI will probably have a decent grade+ wool or silk pile. Foundations vary.

This was a loose rule of thumb I mentioned because of the implementation of simulated silk in many weaving. Simulated silk comes in several forms, rayon, mercerized cotton, etc. In 90% of cases when questioning whether a silk pile is real silk, you can pretty much rule out synthetic fibers for 400 KPSI rugs or more. don't forget, rugs from Turkey (specifically kayseri), Kashmir and China are the most common exceptions, but generally speaking, it would be counter productive to use faux silk in a 400+ KPSI rug. It's really best to just do a test by pulling a knot from the back of a rug.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2010, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.055 seconds.