KrowGyrl wrote:The thing with magnificence is, if it was magnificent a long time ago, it still is today, no matter how old and trashed it is. What I am talking about is ordinary and commonplace that is posited as magnificent just because it if of a type. There are fabulous old carpets that are trashed that can still command a hefty price. But ordinary more commonly produced carpets from 100 years ago are not magnificent. There were classes of carpets and classes of workshops and craftsmen. Karl Lagerfeld is a good example in clothes. In 50 years if you see a table that is selling vintage Karl Lagerfeld clothes and also clothes that are just generic French clothes, I guarantee you the Lagerfelds are better made with superior materials. It's not just a name and will be worth more than some plain old thing that just happens to have been manufactured in France. The same with carpets.
O Lord, save our Krow: Humans with the souls of poets of your distillation are IN HARMS WAY, ok?
Compelling. tangential subject: magnificence in perpetuity, does that exist? Maybe yes, with, say excpetoinal Wooten desk, fine American Windsor chairs, Quezal or Tiffany items with little damage.....but Krow, rugs are at their heart, meant to be walked on. I mean these rugs... these are not prayer rugs with huge spiirtual provenance.
I refuse to apologize for my pragmatic, bourgeois center, and I was raised with almost NOTHING NEW. Not once did I ever worry about walking on my Sarouk---or over drop cloth I put down while building all I did on it....huge stress, tons of sawdust.....nor did anyone one else worry!!!
Only once, when I was growing up, and my livingroom community fish tank started to leak--I had those all over the house....that was during my fish phase which was before my horse phase which was before my guy phase.....did my mother go nuclear. But THAT huge, vivid, full pile (I only now realize, too late) Sarouk.....entire battalions could have marched over and it would not have blinked.
I assumed all semi antique rugs were lke that.
But you raise a very dense issue to be sure, and I hope others weigh in on it.