Well.....factoring in the variatiins in spelling as per keen insight form Pro.....I just came upon this. I even posted, whatever it is, bet it's either too small or too much.

This is a) and does noting for me at all. I am sure it's worth money, but I find it puerile, unremarkable and not even attractive. Not the same as unambiguously garish and pathetic.....which I enjoyed.

http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=2&pub=5574716523&toolid=10001&campid=5336111917&customid=Forum&icep_item=350111336364&ipn=psmain&icep_vectorid=229466&kwid=902099&mtid=824&kw=lg
******************************************
Hold on, just came upon another of Joe's (I also mailed him again).

http://cgi.ebay.com/OVERSIZE-Antique-PERSIAN-SAROUGH-Wool-Rug-10x15-R9630_W0QQitemZ110301428316QQcmdZViewItemQQptZRugs?hash=item110301428316&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1205|66%3A4|65%3A12|39%3A1|240%3A1318|301%3A0|293%3A1|294%3A200

Not simply too big for me, tho my LR is 12 X 20, condition issues (I got spoiled by mine, I now get, i know it's bourgeois), but most of all, I find this not hugely attractive. Not disgusting, but not attractive either.

Pro....do not overestimate me; you were brilliant to raise the spelling issue. I assumed, each time I entered
"Sarouk" in search field, now thousands of times, ebay software would have been written to factor in the variations.

So thanks again for that!