Both rugs are of great value and quality. From what I see I would rather say Ghom than Hereke (Luster, colors and so on) - but Hereke is also possible. But this is more a guess from the first sight. You must understand that no one can give you a price from this little we can see on the pictures, but I think both rugs are below the mentioned kpsi. If you would supply the following pictures it would be very helpful to define the rugs origin correctly:
1. Detail picture showing the selvedge and fringes from the backside of the rug.
2. Close up picture from the front side showing the same area.
3. Detail picture with a measuring device showing the back of the rug so it is possible to count the knots on one inch lenght.
The mosques on the rug are not showing typical turkish arcitecture which would be expected on a Hereke. Top picture is the kaaba in Mecca - this is a holy place for sunna and shia muslim. Among the other pictures are the Imam Reza Shrine in Mashad, the Shrine in Kerbala, the Qum shrine and probably Shiraz and so on - typical Shia mosques in Iran or eastern Iraq. So I would put this rugs design defenetly to the cultutral area of Persia rather than Ottoman. The second rug shows typical persian calligraphy, so also iranian origin seems to be more likely.
Often dealers who do not work with high end rugs every day mistake Qum for Hereke, China for Qum and so on. Due to the higher price of turkish Hereke Silk rugs persian Ghom or Chinese silk rugs are sometimes sold as turkish Hereke.