Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In | Register

I find this rug interesting
talmadge Offline
#1 Posted : Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:59:33 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 14
Points: 42
Location: Erie
I was told this rug was called A Beluchistan. Not sure about the age. Colors are fairly bright. I've had it for awhile but haven't used it all. Any opinions on age? 1960's? Maybe older? I've never seen one like this before. I really like the rug and bought it without much thought. The wool looks kind of newish but the flat weave on the end looks older. This is one rug I really don't care about age or value. I just like the rug.
talmadge attached the following image(s):
full_rugbl.JPG
detail_bl.JPG
fringe1.JPG
back_knot1.JPG
back_knot2.JPG
Sponsor  
 

Love the Rug Rag Forums?

Register above, then purchase a monthly Forum Pass for Full Access

Shereen Offline
#2 Posted : Thursday, April 15, 2010 6:31:11 PM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member

Joined: 11/21/2009(UTC)
Posts: 261
Points: 819
Location: connecticut, USA
Very beautiful!

I'm not an expert, so the following are guesses only. Wait for the experts to confirm (or correct) what I say.

This type of rug is called a Beluch (or Baluch or Belouch, etc.), after the tribes (Beluch tribes) who make them. It's a tribal rug. The Beluch tribes were not restricted to Beluchistan but were living (as Nomads) in various parts of Iran.

The border is a typical Beluch main rug border design, and the field is a typical Beluch main rug field design.

This rug looks compatible with being Beluch, except that you would expect (1) a similar kilim end on the other side and (2) the selvages to look different (goats hair embedding two or three strands of warps next to each other, rather than brown sheep wool simply wrapped around the ends). It is possible that the other kilim end wore out and was removed and that the selvages were redone at some later time. Other than that, the rug looks in very good condition.

It is wool on wool (as real tribal Beluch are).
The colours all look like they could be natural (vegetal) dyes, though I'm not totally sure about the blue, and the two or so little bits of orange could be synthetic.
The colours are also all typical Beluch colors (of the tribes that were further north, in the south you find more and different colors).

Also look at the aesthetics: toward the top right, there is one rhombus with a bright accent in the flowerhead (orange in this case). This is a choice you find in older Beluch rugs.

Again, look at how the sides of the field are irregular, with the weaver making different choices how to solve the beginning of the repeat pattern. And that the left and right are not done symmetrically. (Not also the bit of orange on the right side.) Again, compatible with older Beluch rugs.

I don't know enough to make an informed guess of the age. My uninformed guess suggests it may well be older than 1960s. Or someone followed the older examples very closely.

Old and antique Beluch rugs usually don't range among the most valuable rugs, but I've always loved the unique sense of aesthetics that goes into these rugs, and yours seems, to my inexpert eyes at least, a very nice specimen.
Chris Offline
#3 Posted : Friday, April 16, 2010 5:59:12 AM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 5/14/2009(UTC)
Posts: 358
Points: 1,137
Location: Germany
I like this rug too. It is Mina Khani design...the typical blossoms. Normaly there are also white blossoms between (like this: http://www.spongobongo.com/em/em9746.htm
I really cannot tell how old is your Baluch. From the first feeling my guess is 1940-50. 200-300 ,- USD?
bukhara Offline
#4 Posted : Friday, April 16, 2010 7:28:34 AM(UTC)
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Member, Dealers

Joined: 10/19/2009(UTC)
Posts: 283
Points: 864
Location: Luxembourg
nice rug
talmadge Offline
#5 Posted : Friday, April 16, 2010 5:46:10 PM(UTC)
Rank: Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2010(UTC)
Posts: 14
Points: 42
Location: Erie
Shereen, I think you might be right about the rug formally having a flat weave at the other end. It looks like maybe it was removed or wore away and the end whip stitched. Also, I don't think the side wrapping is original. Looks like it was also repaired. Otherwise, the rug is in good condition with no unusual wear.
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2010, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.074 seconds.